Gwinnett County School District logo




Accountability and flexibility are hallmarks of Gwinnett County Public Schools' success. Key to that success is ensuring that each school community understands the progress being made by its schools, as well as what plans will drive improvement. Each school creates a collaborative Local School Plan for Improvement (LSPI) to increase student achievement results, with targeted goals based on the four strategic priorities within the district’s Blueprint for the Future: Empathy, Equity, Effectiveness, and Excellence. All schools across the district will focus on goals 2A- Multi-tiered Systems of Support and 2B- Opportunity and Access. Additionally, schools are required to select one goal from each of the other strategic priorities. LSPI goals are dynamic, like our schools, and are updated to reflect changes that occur in schools. Multiple data points are used to determine areas needing improvement and to identify specific, measurable, annual objectives. Schools then determine how to use research-based strategies to achieve these goals, using flexibility as needed. The LSPI development process involves teachers, parents, students, and community members, so the entire school community has the opportunity to be involved in conversations about school improvement.

 

2025 - 2026 Local School Plan for Improvement (LSPI)


School: PATRICK ELEMENTARY           Principal: Dr. Ellyce Cone

District Strategic Priorities/Goals Rationale Action Steps
(Implementation Design)
How will you measure growth?
Growth Factors (Baseline & Targets)
Empathy 1.B - Staff and Student Well Being

Before students can succeed academically, they need to feel like they belong. We believe that when students and staff have a strong sense of belonging, it leads to a better overall student experience and directly impacts student learning outcomes.

Student Well-Being:

  1. Counselors will conduct SEL lessons with each individual homeroom class.
  2. Homeroom teachers will implement morning meetings with fidelity. The focus will be on the word of the month, and the time will be used to build classroom community.
  3. PBIS strategies will be implemented to ensure a positive learning environment.
  4. Students will participate in acts of kindness which will be recognized by leaves added to the kindness tree.
  5. Dream Builders mentoring program will be offered for students (based on staff recommendation).
  6. A schoolwide attendance incentive program will be implemented and individualized support for chronically absent students will be provided.

Staff Well-Being:

  1. Staff shout-outs in the weekly staff newsletter.
  2. Staff recognition during staff meetings.
  3. Welcome notes from veteran teachers to all new staff.
  4. New teacher induction activities focused on establishing relationships between the new teachers and the mentors who are supporting their work.
  5. Cluster Back-to-School kickoff at Seckinger HS.

Parent Engagement:

  1. Weekly communication from school to families via parent newsletter.
  2. Weekly communication from teachers to families via class newsletters.
  3. Advertisement of upcoming events across multiple platforms including the school website which supports translation.
  4. Additional translation devices for use by classroom teachers.

Percent of students responding positively to the EES survey questions based on the theme of Supportive Learnng Environment with an emphasis on connecting to at least one adult and understanding that bullying is not tolerated at Patrick ES.

Baseline and Target Goals:

Question EES Theme 2023 2024 (Prior Year) 2025 (Current Year) Change (Current - Prior) Target Goal
In this school, there is at least one adult who knows and cares about me Supportive Learning Environment 73.7% 75.4% 70.7% -4.7% 76%
The rules against bullying are enforced by all adults in this school Supportive Learning Environment 63.8% 74.1% 61.9% -12.2% 75%

 

Percent of staff responding positively to the EES survey questions based on the themes of Clear and Shared Focus, Communication and Readiness to Benefit with an empahsis on trust, openness to change, and ownership of student learning.

Baseline and Target Goals:

Question EES Theme 2023 2024 (Prior Year) 2025 (Current Year) Change (Current - Prior) Target Goal
Staff I work with take responsibility for ensuring each student learns in our school Clear & Shared Focus 96.4% 93.5% 87.7% -5.7% 97%
Staff in our school do not manipulate others to achieve their goals Communication 96.2% 96.5% 76.2% -20.3% 97%
Staff in our school are consistently truthful Communication 96.3% 95.7% 85.6% -10.1% 97%
I welcome new ideas and change Readiness to Benefit 91.1% 93.7% 92.5% -1.2% 95%

 

Percent of staff responding positively to the Gallup Q12 questions which were reported as lowest performing for the 2024 report period.

Question 2024 Report Mean Baseline 2025 Target Goal
At work, I have the opportunity to do what I do best everyday. 4.20 (0.22 decline) 4.50
My supervisor, or someone at work, seems to care about me as a person. 4.50 (0.09 decline) 4.60

 

Percent of parents/guardians participating in the EES Family Survey.

Baseline: 15.4%

Target Goal: 25% (based on completion rates for all ES in GCPS)

 

Percent of families/guardians responding positively as compared to other GCPS elementary schools to the EES survey questions based on the themes of Clear and Shared Focus, Communication and Effective Leadership with an empahsis on communication regarding student progress.

  2025 All ES Results 2025 PES Results 2025 PES Target Goal 2025 PES Actual 
Clear and Shared Focus 84.8% 82.6% 85%  
Communication 89.7% 88.2% 90%  
Effective Leadership 89.1% 86.7% 90%  

Percent of students with chronic absent rates reduced.

Baseline: 108/1086 - 10%

Target Goal: 65/1086 - 6%

Equity 2.A - Multi-tiered System of Supports

We desire to create conditions under which each and every student receives the instructional support to develop to their full potential.

  1. Use screener and historical data to identify students in need of additional tiered supports.
  2. Strategic master scheduling to allow the intervention team and grade level teachers the opportunity to target identified tier 2 and tier 3 students across all grade levels.
  3. Continuance of a dedicated MTSS team to coordiante schedules and monitor effective implementation of the school-wide plan.
  4. Quarterly grade level data reviews to ensure identification of students who need to transition into or out of tiered support opportunities.
  5. Professional learning centered around small group instruction for all classroom teachers.
  6. Collaboration during CLT to ensure consistency of small group instruction across reading and math classrooms.

Student Improvement - reduce the percent of students performing at the beginning proficiency level on the Georgia Milestones assessment based on cohort data models.

Grade Level ELA 24-25 Baseline ELA 25-26 Target ELA 25-26 Actual Math 24-25 Baseline Math 25-26 Target Math 25-26 Actual
3rd 35% 25%   12.5% 10%  
4th 35% 25%   12.5% 10%  
5th 28% 20%   22% 15%  

 

Student Improvement - increase the percent of students reading on grade level on the Georgia Milestones assessment based on cohort data models.

Grade Level Reading 24-25 Baseline Reading 25-26 Target Reading 25-26 Actual
3rd 69% 84%  
4th 69% 76%  
5th 59% 84%  

 

Student Improvement - increase the percent of students in grades 3-5 achieving typical and/or stretch growth on both the iReady reading and math diagnostic midyear assessment based on cohort data models.

Baseline Reading:

Grade Level % Met Typical Growth Baseline % Met Typical Growth Goal % Met Stretch Growth Baseline % Met Stretch Growth Goal
3rd 39% 55% 47% 35%
4th 34% 55% 40% 35%
5th 44% 55% 38% 35%

Baseline Math:

Grade Level % Met Typical Growth Baseline % Met Typical Growth Goal % Met Stretch Growth Baseline % Met Stretch Growth Goal
3rd 48% 55% 55% 35%
4th 60% 55% 64% 35%
5th 43% 55% 52% 35%
Equity 2.B - Opportunity and Access

We believe that in order to provide equitable services for each and every student, we must first assess their academic and social/emotional needs and then use that information to provide appropriate interventions and/or extensions.

  1. Continued deliberate creation of a master schedule that supports the addition of accelerated math and reading sections in grades 3-5.
  2. Continued use of the iReady universal screener to identify gifted students.
  3. Targeted professional learning focusing on small group instruction with an emphasis on calibration across grade level teams.
  4. Continuation of extracurricular learning opportunities before and after school as well as during the school day for all students in grades 3-5 to enhance access and opportunity to participate in focused areas of interest related to AI/Fine Arts/STEM/PE.
  5. Think Labs and Enrichment courses built specifically into student schedules to ensure exposure to and participation in extension activities.

ML English Proficiency: increase the percent of students improving toward English Language proficiency as measured by ACCESS results based on a cohort tracking model.

Grade Level Student Enrollment in ML Program 24-25 Exit Percent Baseline 25-26 Exit Percent Target Goal
1st 29 5 (17%) 25%
2nd 60 10 (17%) 25%
3rd 42 15 (32%) 35%
4th 51 20 (39%) 40%
5th 32 15 (47%) 50%

 

Gifted and Talented Representation: improve the participation of underrepresented racial/ethnic groups in gifted and talented programs.

Baseline:

  Asian/PI Black Hispanic Multiracial White
Patrick ES %  24% 29% 25% 7% 16%
Gifted % EOY 24-25 36% 20% 16% 4% 24%
Gifted Target Goals 36% 25% 20% 7% 24%
Effectiveness 3.A - Results-Based Evaluation System

The mission of Patrick ES is to create a foundation of excellence by providing high quality tier 1 instruction that results in high student performance, character development, social/emotional growth, and future-ready problem solvers.

  1. Teachers will participate in twice weekly collaborative planning sessions led by the assistant principal and instrucional coaches with an intentional focus on small group instruction and calibration across classrooms on the same grade level.
  2. Revision of the Collective Agreements to increase alignment across grade level instructional practices and to ensure collective understanding of classroom expectations.
  3. Professional learning for all certified staff members to ensure instructional alignment.
  4. Intentional coaching cycles for staff in both literacy and math.
  5. Increased intentional walk-through feedback for all certified staff.
  6. Scheduling and room placement that ensures the involvement of special education teachers in collaborative planning and professional learning sessions.

Student Achievement - percent of students performing at the proficient and distinguished levels of the Georgia Milestones assessment in English/Language Arts and Math based on a cohort tracking model.

Grade Level ELA 24-25 Baseline ELA 25-26 Target ELA 25-26 Actual Math 24-25 Baseline Math 25-26 Target Math 25-26 Actual
3rd 40% 55%   56% 65%  
4th 40% 54%   56% 63%  
5th 44% 56%   57% 60%  

 

Student Achievement - decrease the percent of ML students performing below grade level on the Reading portion of the Georgia Milestones Assessment based on a cohort tracking model.

Grade Level Reading 24-25 Baseline Reading 25-26 Target Reading 25-26 Actual
3rd 48% 40%  
4th 53% 40%  
5th 29% 15%